Skip to content

Questions Answered–Alternating Panel Sections and Using Biscuits/dowels


Hi Paul,
It was nice to meet you again at Harrogate. I tend to make up my own panels for furniture from something like 6 *1 boards and have not had any problems. I alternate the grain on adjacent boards and find they come out pretty flat even without the use of biscuits or dowels for levelling. What are your thoughts on using ready laminated pine and hardwood panels, the panels are usually 40mm. It seems most commercial furniture is made this way.
Regards Chris


Thanks for the question, Chris, I have never dowelled panels together because I never saw the need and the same is true of biscuits and biscuit jointers too. Now I am not saying that they don’t have value or add additional security with regards to strength though. Indeed they will help alignment too, especially iof you are on your own gluing up. I did own a biscuit jointer for a brief while when they first came out but in the end it just gathered dust alongside other such equipment.

We all develop techniques and adopt methods for different reasons and then try methods to see what works for us. In my case I use a technique I have developed that’s worked perfectly for aligning all but the largest panels for me for decades; it’s fast and effective. Old dogs–new tricks? Maybe. I just felt like it was unnecessary for me and also an unnecessary piece of equipment intruding my workspace. Oh, and in all my years of creating panels I have never had a glue line fail, so I suppose that proves glue.

With regards to commercially glued panels. I have bought a couple of panels of ready glued panels once from a flea market for 20p and used them. They were fine once I painted them–stayed flat and everything. I think the sophisticated equipment and adhesives used in the commercial sectors are efficient and strong. I see no problem with using them as long as they are grain and colour matched to suit your criteria.
The question of alternating boards to arrange growth rings so that the counterpoise one another comes up frequently as many commercial operations use this to help boards resist creating a mono-convexing/concaving to surfaces used to make say wider surfaces such as tabletops and panels, cutting boards, countertops and so on. Here I think is the reason. Most commercial producers reduce the widths of wider sections of wood to under 3″ and flip them to alternate because it the resultant panel is more stable and more controllable for production and after installation. With very narrow sections this also leads to less decision making in the manufacturing process and of course the narrower the sections used the more uniform the surface patterns and colour. We on the other hand are picking our wood for what we want to create using colour and grain configuration to its optimal advantage and that’s what makes our work different to commerce. Unfortunately flipping is standard because people are fearful that omni-directional cupping will occur and ruin our endeavour. In reality this is more rare than the norm in my experience, even in extreme exchanges. Often flipping boards as has become standard even for individual makers like myself leads to a washboard surface because we tend to use wide surfaces rather than the narrow ones used in commerce. Remember they don’t have someone doing the flipping and matching but often machines do everything.
I took this picture of three 22mm (7/8″) panels I actually glued up around the 5th November and the panels have stayed really close to dead flat (if such a thing were truly possible) even though some I have grain-oriented mainly alternately all the same way and then one that has alternate flipping.

Now of course the thicker the sections you are creating for panels the more problematic panels become and this is where alternating comes into its own. The thicker joined edges push the inner and outer surfaces further apart and of course that means that the surface fibres absorb moisture differently. There are different reasons for this including the wood types, density of one face over the other, end grain absorption versus face grain and then of course surface finishes applied too. It is very common for top faces to receive finish while the underside receives none. Any variation in the amounts of finish applied to the two face, underside and topside, means atmospheric moisture is absorbed at different rates, resulting in possible mass distortion. That being so it is indeed better to use narrow sections as the wider the boards used the greater the influence moisture has and the greater the distortion that takes place.


  1. BrianJ on 24 December 2016 at 3:36 pm

    In high school it was taught that one up, one down was the way it was to be done ( dont follw that now however). There was some dicussion on the wwmc boards recently on this subject too.

  2. Thomas Tieffenbacher on 24 December 2016 at 7:58 pm

    Thanks for your insights Paul. Have a great holiday. Merry Christmas to you and yours!

  3. Mark on 26 December 2016 at 6:18 pm

    I have some expensive wood which I bought from a mill in Totton, Hampshire UK that has been on my rack for a year. I am genuinely nervous about re sawing and then glueing in order to make a jewellery cabinet for my wife. All I can think is that perhaps I ought to leave 2mm top and bottom for planing. Seems a waste but there we are. I have a question though for the team and audience. How long should wood be left after re sawing in order for the stresses to relieve themselves? The reason I ask is that I have found in the past that wood can move after re sawing, sometimes considerably so.
    Here’s to a happy and productive New Year to The Team.

    • Paul Sellers on 26 December 2016 at 7:09 pm

      If you have had the wood in dry conditions then there is no need to wait. Milling oversize gives a margin for another level of milling if needed. So rough cut first at a few mill over and see if any movement takes place. Machine or plane again if there was no change ie cupping and such. Usually this does not happen if you have had the wood in for a while as you say you have. Usually I move straight into joinery from final sizing as the joinery will readily constrain the wood anyway so no real reason to wait as waiting can result in cupping..

  4. Pete The Woodservant on 26 December 2016 at 6:58 pm

    Hi Mark
    I use the following every time. : As long as reasonably possible and as close to the actual position the finished piece will be at: As understood it from the guy who taught me it was much easier for people like Chippendale because their workshop was probably at the same MC as the client’s draughty, leaky, mansion. And he had the authority to convince his clients to have the pile of wood there. Having said that I also (when possible) rough joint the project and leave it apart at the same time. I have gad joints change quit a bit in Centrally heated situations before finally trimming them to fit.
    Not always practical I have to admit but, if it’s a home project there should be no problem with the above. GIVE IT TIME in the long run it will save time and anguish.

  5. John Cadd on 27 December 2016 at 12:28 am

    I saw a nice headline today in a guitar page ; Guitars still think they are trees.
    Happy New Year .

  6. Tommy Lee on 28 December 2016 at 3:39 am

    Hi Paul,
    Merry X’mas from Singapore!
    I am making a bed head and foot boards. They are made up of 5cm timber of 170cm X 20cm. What are your thought of using dowelled joints for large furniture pieces? Not sure that glue is strong enough. Please enlighten!
    Happy New Year to the team!

    • Paul Sellers on 28 December 2016 at 8:46 am

      It depends on where you are using the dowels and glue. Glue alone does not connect end grain wood to long grain long term and that os why we use joinery. Gluing long grain to long grain works well with no need for biscuits or dowels to connect the surfaces. of course you can add them if you wish bit it is still unnecessary generally. `the main advantage if there is one is the edges align more readily as you clamp the pieces and of course they do present slippage generally associated with wet glue at that point of pressure. So, if the dowels replace joinery then go ahead as you have to do more than just glue at intersecting points. Personally I dislike dowels as they were merely steps for dumbing down the art of my profession.

      • Tommy Lee on 28 December 2016 at 12:27 pm

        Thank you for giving me the confidence!
        I will be joining then long grain to long grain.

  • Jeff D on I Read a ReviewSpeaking of chisels and strops...I can't recall if you should strop the flat side of the that called a York pitch on a chisel or just on a plane blade?
  • Ed on As Boring Things Go…Al, I think Paul is saying that humans have a basic need for respect and to feel valued by others. If we take a persons work as just a moment of amusement and then cast it aside, w…
  • Samuel on As Boring Things Go…The actual poor don’t read this blog extensively I think.. And they couldn’t afford a tenon saw or the wood for a bench, unless will power well exceeded means. Rent,fuel, insurance…
  • Jeff D on As Boring Things Go…Can that pillar drill take other kinds of drill bits like the auger bits?
  • Max™ on As Boring Things Go…I was looking at the minicurls coming from my iwasakis and on a lark rubbed some around in my palms when I realized it could make a remarkably nice grit in a hand scrub. I also kee…
  • Al on As Boring Things Go…Paul, I started my journey into hand tool woodworking about a year ago and have learned an incredible amount from your videos and your blogs. You have such a clear and direct manne…
  • John2v on As Boring Things Go…Hi Paul Your handraulic "drill press". I did post a comment the first time you showed it to us about STAVROS GAKOS using one on utube. In fact one of your followers said " he would…
Scroll To Top