Rebate Plane No 2—Bullnose Plane Part II

Setting the bullnose plane

The # 90 bullnose plane is simple enough to use and setting is simple too. The plane can be used in one of two ways, which I have already mentioned in the first section on the bullnose plane. One is where we use the plane fully assembled and then the other is with the top section removed to work like a chisel plane for flush-cutting or finishing that last part of the rebate when it bumps up against an end wall. This takes a little explaining.P1200756P1200567

As with all planes, the blade protruding through the mouth of the sole means the fore and aft part of the plane sole. Pushing the plane forward from its pivot point on the blade edge engages the blade into the wood. The fore and aft are now engaged with the woods surface. As the surface of the wood is removed by the cutting iron, what’s in front of the blade retains its height but what’s after the plane lowers the mid section between the mouth sides of the plane but there is an element of lowering that happens to the height of the new surface cut by the blade. Compressions are taking place to certain narrow aspects of the surface. This occurs once the plane exhausts its rear support length. The thinner the shaving the less noticeable the difference.  Shavings can be around a thousandth so indiscernible by fingertips generally. Rebate planes have no side element either side of the plane blade so pushing the bullnose forward automatically drops the plane the depth of its cut; light shavings only a little and thick shavings a lot. This is indeed a little different than say the bench plane like the #4 and all of the others in the bench plane series. For rebate work using the bullnose the width of the cut is usually narrow, 1/2” or less. When we remove the fore part of the 90 bullnose by unscrewing the setscrew, if the blade is still in the protruding position, where the blade goes past the sole, the blade will penetrate the wood too deeply. In this mode the blade should be flush with the sole as the wood to be removed will be either in the form of a short step at the end of a rebate and above the surface of the main body of wood or material is protruding past the surface of the main body of wood and needs trimming off as say in the case of the top of a plug or a narrow inlay, something like that.

It is well worth noting that the physics of the plane in the cut changes when we remove or install the top section of the plane to create the ‘toe’. The shaving itself develops a tight curl as shown here. P1200770To create a shaving is very different than with the plane fully assembled because you must basically incline the planes sole to indeed take any kind of contours shaving and so the shaving is tapered from the start point and must increase in width as the plane is pushed into the wood. This inclining of the plane body and thereby the sole in its relation to the wood is much less controllable so this removal of the top section of the plane is the scarcity rather than normal because the functionality of the plane is severely limited. Basically the two places this adaptation results in functionality is for finishing off a stopped rebate and for the removal of protruding material above an existing and finished level.

Below shows how very different the resultant shaving is with the top section of the plane in place.

P1200772

That settled, I took two shavings for comparison to show that physical dynamics do indeed take place which drastically affect the plane. The shaving on the left is without the planes top section in place to create the toe. On the right we have the toe in place and return to a very controllable plane giving exquisite control and exquisite work.

P1200773

Left shaving without for part of sole (toe) in place and right with the fore part in place.

Looking inside the plane body we see the blade and the part that Stanley calls the lever. I have called it both the lever cap  and the lever. This component presses against a cross member in the inside recesses of the body casting of the plane to use this as a fulcrum point along the lever cap. Through this we are able to apply pressure to behind the blade and this eliminates or at least minimises chatter at the cutting edge of the cutting iron. So, hopefully, the two following images show the gap open at the point showing between the blade and the bed of the plane. This first image shows the gap expanded before any pressure is applied via the lever.P1200758

P1200759

When we apply pressure to the lever cap via the small setscrew set into the top end of the lever cap we transfer pressure to the fore end of the lever cap. This also tensions the blade which does not sit tight to the bed wholly along the blade’s flat face but bends the blade and closes a gap between the bed and the plane iron (see image above). The more pressure you apply the more closed the gap, but you do run the risk of cracking the lever cap if you apply too much torque so be sensitive.

P1200763

It is worth noting that you can also adjust the distance you set the lever to the fore end of the cutting iron. The reason we vary any distance here is for times when we want to hog off heavy cuts, which in rebating we generally always do to get depth. The above image shows the maximum distance between the lever and the cutting edge. Remember that once you have established say a 1/8” deep wall with a #78 you can switch to #90 bullnose plane and use it freehand to get the rebate down in record time using the plane with a heavy set. Some will say why do that when you can do that with the #78 but the reason is the #78 tends to clog more readily than the #90 and you just poke your finger through on the #90 to express any closing whereas with the #78 it is a little more awkward.

P1200762

The image above shows the closest setting of the lever to the cutting edge.

P1200752

P1200754

The interchanged tops and bottoms retrofitted between the #93 and the #90.

If you happen to own a #90 bullnose and find #93 shoulder rebate plane top section you can use this on the #90 and you have shoulder plane for little less money. P1200753These two planes have interchangeable top pieces. The only issue you might find is the castings may be slightly different between the years of casting but I have always found that they do fit just fine.

The top section of the plane is recessed to fit over two milled recesses each side of the plane. This creates a sliding ability which we use to adjust the throat opening of the plane. By slackening the knurled setscrew we can loosen the toe section, position it in relation to the blade and retighten the setscrew.

The adjustment mechanism

The adjustment of the plane comprises a screw-threaded rod called the cutter adjusting screw, which as parallel aspects to stepped, threaded stem that allow a moving block to move along the threaded stem and so set the plane to a particular depth as needed. P1200755In the top of the block casting is rectangular section protruding from the block that engages in grooves milled into the underside of the cutting iron. This provides ultimately variable positioning for the blade as the blade is shortened through decades of sharpening. My plane still has the original iron after 50 years of use and looks as though it has another 100 years life left in it at the moment of writing.P1200761

Here you can see a gap directly at the leading point of the lever cap. Whereas shaving can enter this gap it is the rarity and not the norm because the shavings actually rise away from the bevel of the cutting iron well before touching the lever cap. The lever cap has two scallops either side of the fore edge. P1200762This diverts the shavings from whichever side of the plane the plane is removing the shaving. I think as well as calling the component a lever cap we should also call it a diverter too.

11 Comments

  1. Joe Bouza on 7 June 2016 at 2:20 am

    Paul,

    Totally enjoying this series of blogs on rebate planes. Great information! Hope you will have time to mention some of the positive (and maybe not so positive) features of combination and multi planes such as Record’s 405 going forward.

    With thanks,
    Joe

  2. Daniel on 7 June 2016 at 6:39 am

    Paul is not a fan of combination planes as I sent an email myself asking to do a video on them, I myself like them for grooving and simple beads, Paul prefers wooden moulding planes which after listing to he’s advice and purchasing a job lot of moulders and tuning them up the difference is night and day. I recently got 2 55s and currently messing around seeing what can be accomplished with this, one thing about the combination planes is the irons must be very sharp.

    • Paul Sellers on 7 June 2016 at 11:40 am

      It wasn’t so much that I don’t like combination planes but that they were presented as planes that replaced the need for a mass of wooden moulding planes to create the same range of hundreds of moulds when that are really very irksome apologies if compared to the dedicate wooden versions that worked and still work so exquisitely. That said, as plough and rebate planes they do work well but then it is an overkill to have a plethora of cutters you can’t really use. Not only do the blades have to be truly sharp, the wood must be straight grained and they need impeccable set up too. No margin for error and if you miss one point your wood is ruined before you know it.

      • Daniel on 7 June 2016 at 2:13 pm

        Yeah that to me is a major downfall the wood can be wrecked very easily. I’m thinking off selling off my 405 and replacing with the veritas plough you use in the videos, I managed to get a couple off nice wooden screw steam ploughs just looking for irons now. Thanks

  3. Alan Prescott on 9 June 2016 at 7:58 am

    OK, Paul, put me out of my misery – should I move the lever towards the cutting edge when ‘hogging’, or away.
    I can excuse some sort of reason for either – moving forwards gives more rigidity but less room for larger shavings and moving back, the reverse.

    • Paul Sellers on 9 June 2016 at 8:46 am

      On the 78 moving the lever upward deepens the depth of cut.

      • Alan Prescott on 9 June 2016 at 4:08 pm

        We may have got crossed wires here, I’m asking about the position of the lever cap in reference to the cutting edge of the blade.
        I missed out the word ‘cap’ in the original post – as usual you only spot the errors after it’s been posted.

  4. Richard on 5 September 2017 at 11:31 pm

    I recently acquired a Stanley #90 in great condition but I noticed the toe part of my plane is a little higher than the rear, is the toe supposed to register on the wood in use ?

    • Paul Sellers on 6 September 2017 at 8:33 am

      Different theories y different people. Some say it is best to have the toe slightly higher and govern the depth of the shaving by this so you can keep the blade protrusion to a very minimum but in my view the alignment via the adjuster will set the cutting edge in relation to the sole and give appropriate variance as needed.

      • Richard on 6 September 2017 at 11:12 am

        Would the slight gap at the toe cause any problem in the handling of the tool, I’m concerned about a tendency to dip / dig in as the blade engages grain etc although I suppose firm pressure on the main body would prevent this ??

        I have to say my early experience with the little #90 is shaky and that it takes some getting used to ( I have never used anything smaller than a Bailey #3 bench plane….)

        Thank you Paul.

        • Paul Sellers on 6 September 2017 at 1:23 pm

          90 block planes do have limited functionality and are generally used to ease narrow elements say to guide rails for drawers and such. They are not seen as a rebating plane to create rebates so much as refine and ease them to refine the passage for the drawer. They are not a versatile plane as such and as some planes are. I f the plane is set for deep cut and especially on wider areas they do become problematic. Little and narrow works best.

Leave a Comment